Hi Juergen,
Juergen Schmidt wrote:
Laurent Godard wrote:
Hi
tend to agree
how would you organize this by sections ?
don't understand what do you mean, can try to explain it again
actually, snippets are classified by Tom
by languages, by product (writer, calc ...)
i think we should keep this classification
yes we should, i will extend the hierarchical structure to take care
of that. But of course i will first choose the language and than the
area. As i already have mentioned in the guidelines it should be
possible to extend the hierarchy on demand and seems that this is a
valid request and i simply forgot it.
i have extended the structure to reflect the same sub categories as
before on the snippet page. See for example
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/API/Samples/StarBasic
I just added a snippet for Impress (well works also for Draw), and put
it here:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/API/Samples/StarBasic/Impress/Insert_a_Chart
However, it is not linked because there is no "Impress". Instead it is
called "Draw/Impress" which means you have a directory Draw, that is
empty except for one sub-directory Impress. Wouldn't it be better to
just call it "Impress" internally and still write "Draw/Impress" in the
page that links there?
And another thing: I put the code in a <code></code> element. When you
add [cpp] or [java] you get syntax highlighting and numbering. When you
add nothing, the non-indented lines do not belong to the code. So, I
added [basic] which has no effect apart from including the non-indented
lines. It would be nice if we also had a mode for "basic".
-Bjoern
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
