OK. I've also made some more changes so that the _free and _destroy functions return an APR_STATUS code rather than a void. A lot of compilers moan when you try to use a void and being able to check the return value is a good thing. On that note we should probably have the individual systems also returning an apr_status_t from their free functions and passing the value back up to the main free and then back to the user, in case of an error...
I'll be committing some changes real soon... The test app is written and once CVS gets sorted out I'll commit it. Looking at the function names, can we drop the system and simply refer to all this as apr_memory_t and so on? Any thoughts? david ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "APR Development List" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 6:04 PM Subject: Re: Memory code... > > BTW, what is Elrond's last name??? > > we don't know :) that _is_ his name :) >
