David Reid wrote: > > Why memsys??? I'm sorry I just don't follow the logic. The code deals with > memory doesn't it? > > > On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:54:51AM +0100, David Reid wrote: > > > Does anyone have any objections to simply calling this stuff > > > apr_memory_blah? > > > > > > That'll give us > > > > > > apr_memory_malloc > > > apr_memory_realloc > > > apr_memory_free > > > apr_memory_is_tracking > > > apr_memory_create > > > apr_memory_reset > > > apr_memory_destroy > > > apr_standard_memory_create > > > apr_tracking_memory_create > > > etc... > > > > prefer memsys, it says more. > > Do we need to say more? Do users really care?
Users may not care, but programmers do :-) The only reason I care is that it doesn't make sense to me to use a word for something that so many other things could equally well use - so my vote would be for sms :-) Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
