Does anyone have any objections to simply calling this stuff apr_memory_blah?
That'll give us apr_memory_malloc apr_memory_realloc apr_memory_free apr_memory_is_tracking apr_memory_create apr_memory_reset apr_memory_destroy apr_standard_memory_create apr_tracking_memory_create etc... all using a type apr_memory_t This seems to make more sense and is short enough I think. If I don't hear any objections I'll try to make the change over the weekend while in Montreal. Also, do we plan on making the plug-ins modular so they can be loaded at run time? Just a thought... david
