On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > I think the thing is that I've seen the sms as slightly different than > what it was originally posted as. So, I might be in the minority > here. I think we are seeing two different views of what an sms should > be. > > My -1 was non-veto, so it doesn't stop you. It just registers my > dissent. -- justin
The group has told me before that, since all code matters require a consensus, -1 always means veto. If you really, really, really don't like it but don't want to veto it, use -0.5 or -0.99 or something. =-) Only in non-consensus-requiring matters do -1's count as "negative votes", but those matters seem to only exist in administrative matters, not code matters. <shrug> --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
