On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Ah. Okay. I thought I've seen people say "-1 (non-veto)" before. Fine,
You have. We're inconsistent as usual. =-) Just thought I'd mention it since it's been mentioned to me in a very similar situation. > consider my vote -0.99999 (because I'm that close to vetoing it, but > I'm not going to do that). Hopefully, my intention *not* to veto > is and was clear. It was. > My apologies. No sweat. =-) --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
