> > See, that's where my overall view of "where we hope to get to" differs. > > <shrug> In my mind, APR depends on pools. Period. It would require a > > major overhaul for most APR operations to be safe WITHOUT pools (ie, lots > > of apr_sms_free operations would have to be added, which is exactly what > > the pools are meant to avoid).
no, no, _wrong_! that's exactly what you _don't_ do, and anyone who proposes it, or thinks that that is what is being proposed, i will stamp on their fingers or break their keyboard in frustration. or something. no. we are _not_ proposing that pools be replaced [with something other than what looks exactly like pools]. same API [pools], different implementation. doing otherwise is just.. _nuts_! you know that, _i_ know that. what on earth makes you think _i_ think otherwise??? darn :) luke
