> That implies that somebody has to alloc a lock outside, but we know that we > can do that: an SMS around malloc(), a pool around that, then a lock using > that pool. We can then pass that lock to SMS(my-custom-bugger).
this lock would be passed in as an argument to the initialisation / creation of an SMS instance, yes? oh, and btw, i'm glad to see that someone else gets this sms stuff :) luke
