* William A. Rowe, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > At 01:39 PM 7/10/2002, you wrote: > >wrowe 2002/07/10 11:39:54 > > > > Modified: . renames_pending > > Log: > > Reorder alpha, and clarify apr_group_id_/apr_user_id_ [still some > > discussion on those.] > > > > +apr_group_id_get from apr_get_groupid > > +apr_group_id_compare from apr_compare_groups > > > > +apr_user_homepath_get from apr_get_home_directory > > +apr_user_id_get from apr_get_userid > > +apr_user_id_current from apr_current_userid > > +apr_user_id_compare from apr_compare_users > > +apr_user_name_get from apr_get_username > > The more I look at this, the odder it seems. > > We define apr_uid_t and apr_gid_t as our user and group id's. These > should all become either apr_userid_xxx or apr_uid_xxx (same with gid). > > Opinions on apr_userid_/apr_groupid_ v.s. apr_uid_/apr_gid_ ? Hrm, think I prefer apr_(u|g)id_ -Thom
-- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <jdub> My personal chef for the night is cooking up a storm! <liedra> You have a personal chef? Neato <jdub> yeah, it rocks. <liedra> Who is it? <jdub> Well, me <jdub> But if I talk in a French accent, I hardly even notice.
