Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Huh? I don't understand this. The child process still destroys the > > > semaphore. > > > > What code is causing the child process to destroy the semaphore? That > > isn't happening for me. Only the parent is doing the semctl(IPC_RMID) > > with my patch. > > add "on my system" at the end of the last sentence...
Oops, my mistake, I failed to apply the complete patch. It works here too. I find disallowing apr_terminate an ugly solution :-( I suppose it's valid for the testsuite problem, but it doesn't look good for applications in general. -- Philip Martin
