Philip Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Huh? I don't understand this. The child process still destroys the > > > > semaphore. > > > > > > What code is causing the child process to destroy the semaphore? That > > > isn't happening for me. Only the parent is doing the semctl(IPC_RMID) > > > with my patch. > > > > add "on my system" at the end of the last sentence... > > Oops, my mistake, I failed to apply the complete patch. It works here > too. > > I find disallowing apr_terminate an ugly solution :-( I suppose it's > valid for the testsuite problem, but it doesn't look good for > applications in general.
Yeah, this apparent restriction on apr_terminate()/pool cleanup is unexpected and ugly. -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Born in Roswell... married an alien...
