<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Follow my logic please.
[snip explanation] I see, thanks. > The real fix for this problem is to fix the test code as I have stated > above so that it is a valid example of how to write APR code, and to fix > the library so that we register cleanups with a public function, and so > that apr_proc_mutex_child_init does the right thing in all cases. I will > do the work later tonight (assuming my wife doesn't go into labor before > then) unless somebody beats me to it. I think the test should also be changed to better exercise the mutex behaviour, i.e. replace (*x)++ with "read, wait, increment, write". Had the test been written like this originally it would not have passed erroneously. It may also help when/if someone ports APR to a new platform. -- Philip Martin
