At 04:32 PM 3/23/2003, Stas Bekman wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >>I'm inclined to suggest we stay with 0.9.2 for the next few days as >>our released version. Collect a week of feedback; fix all new issues >>and then roll out 0.9.3. > >Heh, so did you silently drop the 0.9.2-dev => 0.9.2 schema? I thought the >next release is going to be 0.9.2?
I believe Greg and others argued vocally against that change. We can revisit that decision as we approach 1.0 - but I'd leave it alone for 0.9. No consensus was reached either way. Bill
