At 06:00 PM 3/30/2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >IIRC, there was some sentiment to burn every other minor patch number until we >hit 1.0. So, there would be no 0.9.2 only 0.9.2-dev and 0.9.3. I'm very >uncomfortable with such a scenario (what's the point of -dev then?). It just >doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The -dev's should just not be released. > >Once we hit 1.0, the versioning rules should be in full force. Is there any >dispute over that? -- justin
No... I like the every-other thought. I'd go odds-devel/evens-release. Bill
