Quoting Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
So the pointers to the literals where invalid. Ouch.
Right. I see that my assumption about relying on things after apr_dso_unload()/apr_dso_load() cycle was incorrect.
I'm not sure how to address that at all. I mean if on Linux pointers change after dlclose()/dlopen() cycle (with ref. counts at zero), relying on pointers to be the same is sure to be a bug, right?
I have a feeling that this part of the problem really has to do with abuse caused by programmers using the API and not APR...
-- Bojan
