On 9/18/06, Bojan Smojver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 10:40 -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> I would prefer to leave the global pool alone, and just create a
> separate subpool and mutex around that, since that keeps the global
> pool isolated to apr_pools.c, rather than making it accessed from
> multiple parts of the source tree.
Very much incomplete and most likely dodgy in many places, but is this
what you had in mind?
I would avoid locking when pool isn't NULL, but yeah, that's
essentially what I was thinking of.
-garrett
