William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >>> If we roll over to 1.2.9, I'd like to do it no later than tomorrow evening. >> As I said, I don't view these failures as anything that should hold up 1.2.8. > > Understood - but Solaris seems to be the biggest thorn in our side (and their > own - heh). In combination with the BSD issues, I'd really appreciate if some > folks can jump in and triage these failures - if readily fixed lets bump on, > if not, lets plan a 1.2.9. But I'd really prefer not to roll out a 1.2.9 this > year.
Should have said - I'd really prefer not to roll out 1.2.9 later this year. Let's solve it in this release AS 1.2.9 if we can find the quirks.
