On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:04:41PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:40:05AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > APR test failures on Solaris 10, but not enough for me to consider a > > showstopper for 1.2.8. Details below. APR tests passed on Mac OS X. > > And, APR-util tests passed on both. > > > > Thanks for RMing! -- justin > > > > Solaris 10/Intel, Sun Studio 11: > > testlfs : FAILED 1 of 9 (don't have 8GB free on device) > > testpoll : /Line 314: expected <5>, but saw <4> > > FAILED 1 of 13 > > testsockets : -Line 148: expected <0>, but saw <126> > > hung > > Are these regressions since 1.2.7? I've not seen any report of testlfs > failures on Solaris before AFAIR. Is this some filesystem which doesn't > support sparse files, what's the actual error message?
I am unsure if they are regressions. But, as I mentioned in ()s about testlfs, the test for lfs errors out with a message saying that I don't have 8GB free on the device or that it was out of space. I was building and testing in /tmp which is RAM-backed - so I'm going to ignore that failure for now. -- justin
