Re: [VOTE] Release apr / apr-util 1.2.8 / 0.9.13

[Sander Temme]

On Nov 30, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 05:04:41PM +0000, Joe Orton wrote:

On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 08:40:05AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

APR test failures on Solaris 10, but not enough for me to consider a

And, APR-util tests passed on both.

Thanks for RMing!  -- justin

Solaris 10/Intel, Sun Studio 11:
testlfs             : FAILED 1 of 9 (don't have 8GB free on device)
testpoll            : /Line 314: expected <5>, but saw <4>
                     FAILED 1 of 13
testsockets         : -Line 148: expected <0>, but saw <126>
                     hung

showstopper for 1.2.8. Details below. APR tests passed on Mac OS X.

support sparse files, what's the actual error message?

Are these regressions since 1.2.7? I've not seen any report of testlfs failures on Solaris before AFAIR. Is this some filesystem which doesn't

I am unsure if they are regressions. But, as I mentioned in ()s about testlfs, the test for lfs errors out with a message saying that I don't have 8GB free on the device or that it was out of space. I was building and testing in /tmp which is RAM-backed - so I'm going to ignore that failure for now. -- justin

1.2.7:
Failed Tests            Total   Fail    Failed %
===================================================
testpoll                   13      1      7.69%

1.2.8:
Failed Tests            Total   Fail    Failed %
===================================================
testpoll                   13      1      7.69%

So, no regression.



[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/apr-1.2.8/test$./testall -v testlfs

Failed Tests            Total   Fail    Failed %
===================================================
testlfs                     9      1     11.11%



I don't see any issue with testsockets.

S.

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]              http://www.temme.net/sander/
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4  B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

I just tried 1.2.8 on my Solaris 10 VMWare instance, and testlfs passes without complaints. And no way that instance has 8Gb available. (: However, if I build and test from a source tree in /tmp, like you, testlfs fails for me even more verbosely than for you: testlfs : |Line 79: truncate file to 8gb (28): No space left on device -Line 90: Large file tests not enabled /Line 108: Large file tests not enabled |Line 121: Large file tests not enabled -Line 176: Large file tests not enabled /Line 153: Large file tests not enabled |Line 203: Large file tests not enabled -Line 228: Large file tests not enabled /Line 254: Large file tests not enabled FAILED 1 of 9 So let's chalk that up to an artefact due to the memory backed file system.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature