Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:28:24PM -0000, William Rowe wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:28:18 2007
New Revision: 588061
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588061&view=rev
Log:
Perhaps smaller than long, perhaps larger than long,
let's let ~ bit flipping work this out for us.
I don't suppose it is possible that any platform exists with a signed
size_t?
That would violate K&R all the way through POSIX 99 C, so it's an edge case
we should simply ignore. ssize_t is a little more modern, but still almost
20 years old.
Bill
