On Oct 29, 2007, at 2:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:28:24PM -0000, William Rowe wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:28:18 2007
New Revision: 588061
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588061&view=rev
Log:
Perhaps smaller than long, perhaps larger than long,
let's let ~ bit flipping work this out for us.
I don't suppose it is possible that any platform exists with a
signed size_t?
That would violate K&R all the way through POSIX 99 C, so it's an
edge case
we should simply ignore. ssize_t is a little more modern, but
still almost
20 years old.
IIRC, size_t started with ANSI... IN K&R, there was no real
size_t; sizeof() returned, basically, an "integer constant",
and stdlib.h was an ANSI addition...
