On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Joe Orton wrote:

On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 10:28:24PM -0000, William Rowe wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed Oct 24 15:28:18 2007
New Revision: 588061

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=588061&view=rev
Log:
Perhaps smaller than long, perhaps larger than long,
let's let ~ bit flipping work this out for us.

I don't suppose it is possible that any platform exists with a signed
size_t?

I know it sounds crazy; APR does use hard-code %ld as size_t_fmt for a
few platforms rather than %lu, maybe that is just a bug.


I seem to recall that size_t by definition was unsigned, but
I can't find that ref.

Reply via email to