On Sep 17, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Bojan Smojver schrieb:
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 17:55 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thanks Peter, it begs the question from my last note, should we
refuse
any 2.62 for packaging via our scripts, or just let it slide?
My gutcheck says simply refuse 2.62.
I would generate our configure with 2.61 (for which we know is
good) and
let others choose their own. In many cases, distributions are
shipping
their own patches to 2.62 that are addressing the problem, so no
need to
ban 2.62 outright.
What will be used, once httpd 2.2.10 with bundled apr/apr-util gets
prepared? Last time (2.2.9), httpd configure plus those inside
srclib/apr(-util) got generated with autoconf 2.62.
I've downgraded on my release machine to 2.61
