On 3/9/2010 3:37 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: > > I'm also planning a followup which const-ifies the apr_hash_index_t params to > these functions, as well as apr_hash_this(). Thoughts?
Note const'ness will only be alterable with apr 2.0 forwards. I'm eyeballs to alligators here, so I won't have a chance to do much with this; there are a couple other eager apr contributors looking for my time to evaluate other issues such as the drive letter case sensitivity issue.
