On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 16:42, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On 3/9/2010 3:37 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote: >> >> I'm also planning a followup which const-ifies the apr_hash_index_t params >> to these functions, as well as apr_hash_this(). Thoughts? > > Note const'ness will only be alterable with apr 2.0 forwards.
It is *totally* fine to add a 'const' to a parameter that was not there before. That does not change the ABI whatsoever, and it will not break the API for callers. It merely gives them more information at compile time. Cheers, -g
