> On Mar 12, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> No, it's a design error. There's not much helping that... once it >> ships, that's our implementation. Might caution us to provide more >> careful code review before n.n.0 releases on new features. > > > Soooo.... if apr_snprintf("%d" were to, on every 50th int, print > it out in decimal form, that would be a "design error"? :)
s/decimal/float/p > > If so, how can we call it a "skiplist" which has a set of compliant > expectations? It's not a skiplist implementation at all since it > is broken. > >
