On 09/15/2018 08:16 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
No worries, thanks for all the follow up.
I am a little concerned that some 'fix' in a later ptf has changed poll
semantics in an undesirable way, but we will just be patient and wait
for word.
Again, TY,
Small annoying patch :
*** locks/unix/proc_mutex.c_backup Wed May 24 15:24:15 2017
--- locks/unix/proc_mutex.c Sat Sep 15 22:40:29 2018
***************
*** 425,431 ****
return rv;
}
}
! if (munmap(mutex->os.pthread_interproc,
sizeof(proc_pthread_mutex_t))) {
return errno;
}
return APR_SUCCESS;
--- 425,431 ----
return rv;
}
}
! if (munmap((void*)mutex->os.pthread_interproc,
sizeof(proc_pthread_mutex_t))) {
return errno;
}
return APR_SUCCESS;
***************
*** 443,449 ****
return errno;
}
! new_mutex->os.pthread_interproc = mmap(NULL,
sizeof(proc_pthread_mutex_t),
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED,
fd, 0);
if (new_mutex->os.pthread_interproc == MAP_FAILED) {
--- 443,450 ----
return errno;
}
! new_mutex->os.pthread_interproc = (pthread_mutex_t*)mmap(NULL,
! sizeof(proc_pthread_mutex_t),
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_SHARED,
fd, 0);
if (new_mutex->os.pthread_interproc == MAP_FAILED) {
That takes care of those warnings.
All tests pass and I am now moving on to a rebuild of httpd-trunk using
the new apr and apr-util and hope to have that running in a few hours.
Dennis
