On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 8:38 PM William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:49 AM Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Possibly to resolve APR_<INTTYPE>_T_FMT on system with >> [std]int[types].h, we could bind to the standard (C99?) format >> PR[dxo..]N, especially since we configure the format based off >> $ac_cv_sizeof_<inttype>, so something like: >> #define APR_<INTTYPE>_T_FMT PR[dxo..]`expr $ac_cv_sizeof_<inttype>_t * 8` >> >> That should work on most "modern" systems/compilers (including >> -stdc=c89), no? And for older ones the current as fallback could be >> reasonable. > > > No, not with c89 (not as any sort of standard, -stdc is irrelevant.)
Do you mean C89 only compilers which don't support C99+ (i.e. -stdc or alike), and thus no inttypes.h and so on? Well, configure would work as today for them, and AIUI this is not on those systems that we have an issue.
