On 18. 5. 26 00:15, Noel Butler wrote:
On 18/05/2026 06:34, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 16. 5. 26 08:58, Noel Butler wrote:
On 16/05/2026 10:09, Noel Butler wrote:
i stopped reading at that, because its quite obvious you're out
to make problems for anyone woh disagrees with you, save your
breath, and after you apologise to the list for using offensive
language, ensure you dont mail me directly again.
Ohh, and I'm not surprised at the backup squad you brought in to
push for cmake support, since I've received no less than three
Emails today advising me of your association with Daniel Sahlberg
and Nathan Hartman, you've all known each other for over 10 years.
Says it all doesn't it :) ... and thats rhetorical, not a question.
Careful with those ad hominems. I'm no stranger to having strong
opinions and using strong language on list, but you went way over the
line there.
-- Brane
*I was not the one who used the actual F word, *
Frankly, I don't care about any word used in this thread. If you want to
play sophistry games by replacing u with s, go right ahead. However,
*attacking Daniel and Nathan personally because of their association
with Timofei* is completely out of line. As is attacking him personally
because of his opinions about CMake don't align with yours.
funny how nobody recognizes that and dares say boo about it to who
actually did use it, yet are more than happy to nag on me for using a
word I never used, with that borders on a threat, I can see clearly
right through you.
I can see whats going on here. 30 years of running abuse depts, RBL's,
usenet servers and a 17year stint as an IRC oper on one of the most
popular (and tough and rogue) networks around gives me thick skin, but
also the ability to see right through people and their agendas.
Ah, I see, hidden agendas, conspiracies. And the old and well-worn
argumentum ad auctoritatem, which in some ways is worse than ad hominem.
If you can't hold a reasonably polite technical discussion without
immediately attacking people who disagree with you, you may have trouble
getting valid points across. I'll remind you that your very first post
in this thread started in a needlessly aggressive manner.
At this point the thing to do would be to take a deep breath, a step
back, and start again /without/ assuming everyone is out to get you.
-- Brane
