On Mon, May 18, 2026 at 2:59 AM Branko Čibej <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 18. 5. 26 08:40, Noel Butler wrote: > > On 18/05/2026 10:17, Branko Čibej wrote: > > On 18. 5. 26 01:50, Noel Butler wrote: > > On 18/05/2026 09:35, Branko Čibej wrote: > > > At this point I'm just fed up with your mindless conspiracy theories and > your trolling. Reminds me of someone, but I'll pass because it gets > political. Go play in your own sandbox, you clearly don't belong here. > > > -- Brane > > > and there we have it... > > > Yes, there you have it. Participating in a public discussion is a > privilege, not a right. If you abuse people, they might object. > > Maybe if you'd read what I wrote instead of knee-jerking paranoid > responses, we'd not have come to this point. Having seen a small example of > your posting history, however, this is par for the course. > > -- Brane > > > nothing paranoid at all, *the evidence is there for everyone to make > their own mind up...* > > > You however, are nothing more than a bully, I love to deal with your kind, > it's a hobby putting bullies back in their place, oh, you forgot to add > your also on project committee for APR and thus exceeded your role by > basically telling me to get off this list, of course you dont have the > authority to do that, telling someone to go play in their sandbox, and get > out of here, your just part of a steering committee for the direction of > APR, nothing more, its rather sad that bullying is all your kind can manage > when called out. > > I aint going anywhere unless asked by the Chair to leave, after which I > trust he pulls you in for your behaviour here. you can try belittle me all > you like, i've copped far far worse from teenagers on IRC, right before > that G line dropped. > > > I always speak and write in my own name, unless I explicitly say otherwise. > > So in my own name I repeat that you're way out of line and need to learn > some basic netiquette before participating on a public forum. I'd give you > the benefit of the doubt if this was an isolated case, but looking at some > other examples from archives, this seems to be how you "communicate". > The form of communication seems to be to derail the discussion rather than participate in it. I suggest returning to the intended topic and ignoring any further disruptions. > > I realise your now continuously trying to bait me hoping I'll cross the > line that would force the Chairs hand, you'll have to try harder to annoy > me, much better people than you have tried and failed. > > > You personally attacked people on this list. No baiting was involved. I > tried to gently point that out. You responded with agendas and > conspiracies. Clearly you're used to forums where this is accepted > behaviour. This is not one of those forums. > > Well, that tells me all I need to know about you and I have a very > specific opinion about people who behave like that. So I'm done with you. > > -- Brane > > Ditto Nathan
