On 21/12/2012, at 7:39 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > Note something I'd like to add is to be able to use only ldap > (including for roles). > But probably not yet for this release, I have to think which ldap > attributes to use for role mapping (and a couple of other things :-) > ). > Such feature makes sense ?
I'm not sure you'll get the granularity of the resources/permissions that you want without overly-polluting LDAP or unless you limit it to the global roles. Probably the better way to approach it is to add support for groups (mapped onto LDAP) that can be assigned to roles (still stored in Archiva/Redback). - Brett -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter http://twitter.com/brettporter
