So finally I will implement that for 1.4-M4 :-) That sounds to be a nice feature to have. The idea will be to add some configuration mapping between ldap group and archiva/redback roles.
2012/12/21 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]>: > 2012/12/21 Brett Porter <[email protected]>: >> >> On 21/12/2012, at 7:39 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Note something I'd like to add is to be able to use only ldap >>> (including for roles). >>> But probably not yet for this release, I have to think which ldap >>> attributes to use for role mapping (and a couple of other things :-) >>> ). >>> Such feature makes sense ? >> >> I'm not sure you'll get the granularity of the resources/permissions that >> you want without overly-polluting LDAP or unless you limit it to the global >> roles. >> >> Probably the better way to approach it is to add support for groups (mapped >> onto LDAP) that can be assigned to roles (still stored in Archiva/Redback). > > Sounds good to do such mapping. > But for next release :-) > >> >> - Brett >> >> -- >> Brett Porter >> [email protected] >> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ >> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter >> http://twitter.com/brettporter >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Olivier Lamy > Talend: http://coders.talend.com > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
