2012/12/21 Brett Porter <[email protected]>: > > On 21/12/2012, at 7:39 PM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Note something I'd like to add is to be able to use only ldap >> (including for roles). >> But probably not yet for this release, I have to think which ldap >> attributes to use for role mapping (and a couple of other things :-) >> ). >> Such feature makes sense ? > > I'm not sure you'll get the granularity of the resources/permissions that you > want without overly-polluting LDAP or unless you limit it to the global roles. > > Probably the better way to approach it is to add support for groups (mapped > onto LDAP) that can be assigned to roles (still stored in Archiva/Redback).
Sounds good to do such mapping. But for next release :-) > > - Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > [email protected] > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > http://twitter.com/brettporter > > > > > -- Olivier Lamy Talend: http://coders.talend.com http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
