Hello all!
After Tom's question about this I just sent the following question to
the Conservancy. I hope that the answer will clarify this for us.
Have I missed something or is Tom the only person that has sent a
comment on the Conservancy issue? I hope this means that you others are
all approving of this without any questions.
/Linus
-----Original Message-----
From: Linus Tolke
Sent: den 24 september 2006 00:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ArgoUML: invitation to join Conservancy
Hello Karen!
There are a couple of questions that has come up during the discussion.
First question:
In paragraph 2c, why is "public information work" included. What does it
means.
Second question:
The agreement is all about handling money in the project. There are some
other important issues for us where we need the conservancy to guide us
and that is not mentioned at all. It is the licenses and trademarks.
Licenses:
We currently have an old BSD license pointing to "The Regents of the
University of California". Is this good or bad? Should we change it?
Shall we wait for us to have joined before starting the discussions of
these issues?
Trademark:
Currently Jason Robbins owns the argouml.org domain. Any discussions if
we should strengthen this by registering ArgoUML as a trademark, is this
something where you have a clear path forward and that you will take
care of for us?
/Linus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Sandler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: den 14 september 2006 16:31
> To: Linus Tolke
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ArgoUML: invitation to join Conservancy
>
>
>
> Linus Tolke wrote:
>
> >Hello Karen!
> >
> >We will discuss this and perhaps get back to you with questions.
> >
> >
> OK! Of course, feel free to ask questions by email or by phone
> (212-461-1908).
>
> Karen
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
