Some comments on the governance structure of the project...
Tom Morris wrote:
[...]
> A much bigger issue is that the agreement assumes the project has, or
will
> establish, an internal governance structure and we have none. We
really
> need to get our act together and create some kind of reasonable
charter
> and
> governance structure. Six years ago being the leading implementor of
UML
> 1.3 might have been a great vision, but it's getting a little dated
now.
> The SFC agreement requires a clearly delineated set of authorities for
the
> project. Will it be a single supreme leader or 2/3 majority of all
> registered developers or simple majority of active developers or ... ?
[...]
I don't think an updated charter is needed to join the conservancy. It
is however needed for a lot of other reasons.
About the governance structure I didn't see any need to make changes for
this purpose either. That means a single supreme leader as it is
documented in the "About box" and on the Project ArgoUML Members with
Responsibilities page.
/Linus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
