Hi! -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:47:24 +0200 > Von: alexander krohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] two types of contributing OSS developers
--<snip>-- > i don't agree much here. > > for me it's a very big advantage in doing oss to *not* bring out > bells-n-whistle-features every week and push them into market, that's > what m$ and other companies have to do. If MS _would_ do this, there might be less need for OSS. Instead they have their 2 or 3 year release cycle, and a good part of what is released is old stuff in a new package. OSS often solved special problems, that no company was willing to solve (for a reasonable price). But I thought, it's the problem, that drives the development, not just development for the sake of development. So it seems to me, that Argo has lost contact to it's userbase, and maybe it's even worse, because noone seems to care. So in way it's a solution, that doesn't even look anymore for a problem that fits. My 0,02, Andreas -- GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen Interessen! Jetzt dabei sein: http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
