Personally I think we are ready for 0.26.1 (once the last branch patch is applied for issue 5420).
Both myself and Christian have diverted all attention that might have gone into the sequence diagrams in order to sort out this branch. So our work towards 0.28 is behind. I'll get back to sequence diagrams next. Where are others regarding the merge of GSOC work? Should we be amending our 0.28 timelines? Bob. 2008/11/3 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Bob, > > the actual status for 0.26.1 looks promising, I hope the release comes soon! > > Our team was a little "slow" regarding 0.26.1 (I don't exclude myself), I > wonder how our progress will be with "just" integrating the GSoC work for the > next stable release (I'm not sure about my own contributions in the next > times). > > Regards, > Thomas > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >> Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:45:24 +0000 >> Von: "Bob Tarling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> An: dev@argouml.tigris.org >> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] 0.26.1 status > >> It looks like we are closer to getting all 0.26.1 issues resolved. >> >> I repeat my request for a release plan. >> >> Bob. >> >> >> 2008/10/30 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > What are the feelings about now going ahead with 0.26.1 (marking issue >> > 5438 as fixed and untargeting issue 5420) >> > >> > I would rather have 5420 fixed if possible but I think it's more >> > important to have a release out asap with the other fixes. >> > >> > What's the procedure for a defect release. Do we do one beta and then >> > release? What are the timescales? >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > Bob. >> > >> > >> > 2008/10/27 Christian López Espínola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Hi Bob, >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that this is most >> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused any >> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed. >> >>> >> >>> Are there any views on the above statement? >> >> >> >> I need to test those patches on the branch. >> >> First step would be getting them and attaching to the issue, applying >> >> to the branch and test. >> >> But I'm really busy this week, so I don't know how many testing I will >> >> be able of doing on them. >> >> Help is welcome. >> >> >> >>> If there are no known manifestation of defect 5438 then I'd prefer >> >>> i (ssue 5476 and 5477 were done instead but with more time and testing >> >>> than would be available for 0.26.1. >> >> >> >> I've read those and they seem great for the next release. IMHO they >> >> make things simpler. >> >> >> >>> Bob. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> 2008/10/26 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>>> I'm back from holiday now. >> >>>> >> >>>> Is there any change in the opinion on this? Is issue 5438 still >> >>>> considered the only showstopper for 0.26.1? >> >>>> >> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that this is most >> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused any >> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed. >> >>>> >> >>>> Bob. >> >>>> >> >>>> 2008/10/15 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>>>> Hi! >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> > I'm concerned about the fixes for issue 5438, exceptions on >> delete, >> >>>>>> > since they seem to be more extensive than the limited testing >> we'll be >> >>>>>> > doing would make appropriate, although Christian seems in favor >> of >> >>>>>> > including them in the release. Someone needs to finish the work >> >>>>>> > though. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> So this is our only "must have" for 0.26.1? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Is anybody able to tackle this? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> It is the only 0.26.1 stopper in my opinion. Yesterday I tried one >> hour to figure how to fix it, but no success: it's not very clear to me what >> needs to be done in the Fig classes, and how to test if it is done >> properly. Anybody else? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thomas >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen >> Interessen! >> >>>>> Jetzt dabei sein: >> http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> >> Christian López Espínola <penyaskito> >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > GMX Download-Spiele: Preizsturz! Alle Puzzle-Spiele Deluxe über 60% billiger. > http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/download/puzzle/index.html > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
