After 0.26.1 ;-). Let me set suggest next week.

        /Linus

2008/11/10 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Hi Linus & all,
>
> when will be ready for 0.27.2?
>
> Thomas
>
> P.S.: The 0.26.1.BETA_1 claims to be the 0.26.1 release already, was this
> intended? I hope we won't get into trouble...
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > Datum: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:20:09 +0100
> > Von: "Linus Tolke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: dev@argouml.tigris.org
> > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] 0.28 GSOC merge (was 0.26.1 status)
>
> > I have now made a suggestion of setting the alpha/beta in January
> > according
> > to your wishes. Look at the Google calendar to see if it fits you!
> >
> >         /Linus
> >
> > 2008/11/9 Luis Sergio Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > Linus Tolke wrote:
> > >
> > >> When will you be ready for entering the alpha period for 0.28? Bob and
> > >> Luis, what does "amended" mean in this case? The first alpha release
> > was set
> > >> a long time ago to Wednesday. Is that too early? Should we make a
> > 0.27.2
> > >> release instead?
> > >>          /Linus
> > >>
> > >>  Although I and Bogdan have already started, we started 3 weeks behind
> > > schedule I'm afraid that our rate of merging and polishing is too slow,
> > so,
> > > the 6 weeks Bob proposes in his reply would also be good for me.
> > >
> > > Luis
> > >
> > >> 2008/11/5 Jan M. Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:
> > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >>
> > >>    I have just started work on merging the GSOC work in the C-Sharp
> > >>    module so
> > >>    I'm definitely behind.
> > >>
> > >>    I'll be on vacation from nov. 11th. And I'm not sure if I will be
> > >>    able to
> > >>    complete it before then.
> > >>
> > >>    Vennlig hilsen
> > >>    Jan M. Andersen
> > >>    Tlf. 90 20 76 17
> > >>    Primrose
> > >>
> > >>    -----Original Message-----
> > >>    From: Bob Tarling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > >>    Sent: 4. november 2008 23:01
> > >>    To: dev@argouml.tigris.org <mailto:dev@argouml.tigris.org>
> > >>    Subject: [argouml-dev] 0.28 GSOC merge (was 0.26.1 status)
> > >>
> > >>    Personally I think we are ready for 0.26.1 (once the last branch
> > patch
> > >>    is applied for issue 5420).
> > >>
> > >>    Both myself and Christian have diverted all attention that might
> > have
> > >>    gone into the sequence diagrams in order to sort out this branch.
> So
> > >>    our work towards 0.28 is behind.
> > >>
> > >>    I'll get back to sequence diagrams next.
> > >>
> > >>    Where are others regarding the merge of GSOC work? Should we be
> > >>    amending our 0.28 timelines?
> > >>
> > >>    Bob.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    2008/11/3 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> > >>    > Hi Bob,
> > >>    >
> > >>    > the actual status for 0.26.1 looks promising, I hope the release
> > >>    comes
> > >>    soon!
> > >>    >
> > >>    > Our team was a little "slow" regarding 0.26.1 (I don't exclude
> > >>    myself), I
> > >>    wonder how our progress will be with "just" integrating the GSoC
> > >>    work for
> > >>    the next stable release (I'm not sure about my own contributions
> > >>    in the next
> > >>    times).
> > >>    >
> > >>    > Regards,
> > >>    > Thomas
> > >>    >
> > >>    > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > >>    >> Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:45:24 +0000
> > >>    >> Von: "Bob Tarling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >>    >> An: dev@argouml.tigris.org <mailto:dev@argouml.tigris.org>
> > >>    >> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] 0.26.1 status
> > >>    >
> > >>    >> It looks like we are closer to getting all 0.26.1 issues
> > resolved.
> > >>    >>
> > >>    >> I repeat my request for a release plan.
> > >>    >>
> > >>    >> Bob.
> > >>    >>
> > >>    >>
> > >>    >> 2008/10/30 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> > >>    >> > What are the feelings about now going ahead with 0.26.1
> > >>    (marking issue
> > >>    >> > 5438 as fixed and untargeting issue 5420)
> > >>    >> >
> > >>    >> > I would rather have 5420 fixed if possible but I think it's
> > more
> > >>    >> > important to have a release out asap with the other fixes.
> > >>    >> >
> > >>    >> > What's the procedure for a defect release. Do we do one beta
> > >>    and then
> > >>    >> > release? What are the timescales?
> > >>    >> >
> > >>    >> > Regards
> > >>    >> >
> > >>    >> > Bob.
> > >>    >> >
> > >>    >> >
> > >>    >> > 2008/10/27 Christian López Espínola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> > >>    >> >> Hi Bob,
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bob Tarling
> > >>    <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > >>    >> wrote:
> > >>    >> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that
> > >>    this is
> > >>    most
> > >>    >> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused
> > any
> > >>    >> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed.
> > >>    >> >>>
> > >>    >> >>> Are there any views on the above statement?
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >> I need to test those patches on the branch.
> > >>    >> >> First step would be getting them and attaching to the issue,
> > >>    applying
> > >>    >> >> to the branch and test.
> > >>    >> >> But I'm really busy this week, so I don't know how many
> > >>    testing I will
> > >>    >> >> be able of doing on them.
> > >>    >> >> Help is welcome.
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >>> If there are no known manifestation of defect 5438 then I'd
> > >>    prefer
> > >>    >> >>> i (ssue 5476 and 5477 were done instead but with more time
> > and
> > >>    testing
> > >>    >> >>> than would be available for 0.26.1. <http://0.26.1./>
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >> I've read those and they seem great for the next release.
> > >>    IMHO they
> > >>    >> >> make things simpler.
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >>> Bob.
> > >>    >> >>>
> > >>    >> >>>
> > >>    >> >>> 2008/10/26 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> > >>    >> >>>> I'm back from holiday now.
> > >>    >> >>>>
> > >>    >> >>>> Is there any change in the opinion on this? Is issue 5438
> > >>    still
> > >>    >> >>>> considered the only showstopper for 0.26.1?
> > >>    >> >>>>
> > >>    >> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that
> > >>    this is
> > >>    most
> > >>    >> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused
> > any
> > >>    >> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed.
> > >>    >> >>>>
> > >>    >> >>>> Bob.
> > >>    >> >>>>
> > >>    >> >>>> 2008/10/15 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL 
> > >> PROTECTED]>>:
> > >>
> > >>    >> >>>>> Hi!
> > >>    >> >>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>>> > I'm concerned about the fixes for issue 5438,
> > >>    exceptions on
> > >>    >> delete,
> > >>    >> >>>>>> > since they seem to be more extensive than the limited
> > >>    testing
> > >>    >> we'll be
> > >>    >> >>>>>> > doing would make appropriate, although Christian seems
> > >>    in favor
> > >>    >> of
> > >>    >> >>>>>> > including them in the release.  Someone needs to
> > >>    finish the work
> > >>    >> >>>>>> > though.
> > >>    >> >>>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>>> So this is our only "must have" for 0.26.1?
> > >>    >> >>>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>>> Is anybody able to tackle this?
> > >>    >> >>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>> It is the only 0.26.1 stopper in my opinion. Yesterday I
> > >>    tried one
> > >>    >> hour to figure how to fix it, but no success: it's not very
> > >>    clear to me
> > >>    what
> > >>    >> needs to be done in the Fig classes, and how to test if it is
> > done
> > >>    >> properly. Anybody else?
> > >>    >> >>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>> Thomas
> > >>    >> >>>>> --
> > >>    >> >>>>> GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen
> > >>    >> Interessen!
> > >>    >> >>>>> Jetzt dabei sein:
> > >>    >> http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    >> >>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>>
> > >>    >>
> > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>    >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >>    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    >> >>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>>
> > >>    >> >>>>
> > >>    >> >>>
> > >>    >> >>>
> > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>    >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>    [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    >> >>>
> > >>    >> >>>
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >> --
> > >>    >> >> Cheers,
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >> Christian López Espínola <penyaskito>
> > >>    >> >>
> > >>    >> >
> > >>    >>
> > >>    >>
> > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>    >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    >
> > >>    > --
> > >>    > GMX Download-Spiele: Preizsturz! Alle Puzzle-Spiele Deluxe über
> > 60%
> > >>    billiger.
> > >>    >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/download/puzzle/in
> > >>    dex.html
> > >>    <
> > >>
> >
> http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/download/puzzle/index.html
> > >> >
> > >>    >
> > >>    >
> > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>    > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    >
> > >>    >
> > >>
> > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    No virus found in this incoming message.
> > >>    Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
> > >>    Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.6/1766 - Release Date:
> > >>    11/4/2008
> > >>    8:26 AM
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>    For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>    <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> "Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
> Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to