Linus Tolke wrote:
When will you be ready for entering the alpha period for 0.28? Bob and
Luis, what does "amended" mean in this case? The first alpha release
was set a long time ago to Wednesday. Is that too early? Should we
make a 0.27.2 release instead?
/Linus
Although I and Bogdan have already started, we started 3 weeks behind
schedule I'm afraid that our rate of merging and polishing is too slow,
so, the 6 weeks Bob proposes in his reply would also be good for me.
Luis
2008/11/5 Jan M. Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
I have just started work on merging the GSOC work in the C-Sharp
module so
I'm definitely behind.
I'll be on vacation from nov. 11th. And I'm not sure if I will be
able to
complete it before then.
Vennlig hilsen
Jan M. Andersen
Tlf. 90 20 76 17
Primrose
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Tarling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
Sent: 4. november 2008 23:01
To: dev@argouml.tigris.org <mailto:dev@argouml.tigris.org>
Subject: [argouml-dev] 0.28 GSOC merge (was 0.26.1 status)
Personally I think we are ready for 0.26.1 (once the last branch patch
is applied for issue 5420).
Both myself and Christian have diverted all attention that might have
gone into the sequence diagrams in order to sort out this branch. So
our work towards 0.28 is behind.
I'll get back to sequence diagrams next.
Where are others regarding the merge of GSOC work? Should we be
amending our 0.28 timelines?
Bob.
2008/11/3 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
> Hi Bob,
>
> the actual status for 0.26.1 looks promising, I hope the release
comes
soon!
>
> Our team was a little "slow" regarding 0.26.1 (I don't exclude
myself), I
wonder how our progress will be with "just" integrating the GSoC
work for
the next stable release (I'm not sure about my own contributions
in the next
times).
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 10:45:24 +0000
>> Von: "Bob Tarling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> An: dev@argouml.tigris.org <mailto:dev@argouml.tigris.org>
>> Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] 0.26.1 status
>
>> It looks like we are closer to getting all 0.26.1 issues resolved.
>>
>> I repeat my request for a release plan.
>>
>> Bob.
>>
>>
>> 2008/10/30 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>> > What are the feelings about now going ahead with 0.26.1
(marking issue
>> > 5438 as fixed and untargeting issue 5420)
>> >
>> > I would rather have 5420 fixed if possible but I think it's more
>> > important to have a release out asap with the other fixes.
>> >
>> > What's the procedure for a defect release. Do we do one beta
and then
>> > release? What are the timescales?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Bob.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2008/10/27 Christian López Espínola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>> >> Hi Bob,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Bob Tarling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that
this is
most
>> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused any
>> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed.
>> >>>
>> >>> Are there any views on the above statement?
>> >>
>> >> I need to test those patches on the branch.
>> >> First step would be getting them and attaching to the issue,
applying
>> >> to the branch and test.
>> >> But I'm really busy this week, so I don't know how many
testing I will
>> >> be able of doing on them.
>> >> Help is welcome.
>> >>
>> >>> If there are no known manifestation of defect 5438 then I'd
prefer
>> >>> i (ssue 5476 and 5477 were done instead but with more time and
testing
>> >>> than would be available for 0.26.1. <http://0.26.1./>
>> >>
>> >> I've read those and they seem great for the next release.
IMHO they
>> >> make things simpler.
>> >>
>> >>> Bob.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2008/10/26 Bob Tarling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>> >>>> I'm back from holiday now.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Is there any change in the opinion on this? Is issue 5438
still
>> >>>> considered the only showstopper for 0.26.1?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Should it actually be a showstopper? It seems to me that
this is
most
>> >>>> likely a long term bug that doesn't appear to have caused any
>> >>>> problems other than that which Tom has already fixed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Bob.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2008/10/15 Thomas N. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>> >>>>> Hi!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> > I'm concerned about the fixes for issue 5438,
exceptions on
>> delete,
>> >>>>>> > since they seem to be more extensive than the limited
testing
>> we'll be
>> >>>>>> > doing would make appropriate, although Christian seems
in favor
>> of
>> >>>>>> > including them in the release. Someone needs to
finish the work
>> >>>>>> > though.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> So this is our only "must have" for 0.26.1?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Is anybody able to tackle this?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> It is the only 0.26.1 stopper in my opinion. Yesterday I
tried one
>> hour to figure how to fix it, but no success: it's not very
clear to me
what
>> needs to be done in the Fig classes, and how to test if it is done
>> properly. Anybody else?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thomas
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> GMX startet ShortView.de. Hier findest Du Leute mit Deinen
>> Interessen!
>> >>>>> Jetzt dabei sein:
>> http://www.shortview.de/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> Christian López Espínola <penyaskito>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --
> GMX Download-Spiele: Preizsturz! Alle Puzzle-Spiele Deluxe über 60%
billiger.
>
http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/download/puzzle/in
dex.html
<http://games.entertainment.gmx.net/de/entertainment/games/download/puzzle/index.html>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.6/1766 - Release Date:
11/4/2008
8:26 AM
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
