Hi! -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:50:33 +0100 > Von: Bob Tarling <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] The UML2 diagrams module(s) - (was The class2 > module)
--<snip>-- > The main thing that needs to be abstracted is UML2. I agree. > I'd also like to see movement towards abstracting out GEF and this is > certainly a step in the right direction. I also agree. But considering myself as a module developer at the moment, I wonder how to move on. It would be great if the project (read: Linus) would give a statement how to proceed with the UML2 transition further. Use Bob's module concept or the current 'official' code in the trunk? I have to create figure objects (as an example), so I'd appreciate a statement which API calls should be used from now on. Ciao, Andreas -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2382437 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
