Hi! -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:04:47 +0100 > Von: Bob Tarling <[email protected]> > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] The UML2 diagrams module(s) - (was The class2 > module)
> > It would be great if the project (read: Linus) would give a > > statement how to proceed with the UML2 transition further. > > It would be great to have some more input from everyone. I feel rather > isolated in my work at the moment. There are many things I don't know > how to do within euml (currently stuck with stereotypes, > multiplicities and extension points). I felt the same way, when I contributed to the UML2 transition, as you know. But you came across like you wanted to do some experimental branch of the UML2 transition to see if (or how) you could do this with those diagram modules. It seemed to me, that you were not interested in contributions at that point. > Everything seems to have come to a halt and I worry if this is because > people know that the next release is targeted for UML2 and know that > efforts are required there but don't know how to achieve that end. I agree. I don't know if you were in the chat, when I mentioned, that we should make a list with known problems and then try to come up with solutions in a more systematical way. I already mentioned there, that we could find and target developers, that might have the time and the interest to contribute (i.e. approach university tutors etc). > So people who could otherwise at least be coding other enhancements > and bug fixes for us are not active any more. I don't know how many active developers exist at the moment, and where they are working. > > Use Bob's module concept or the current 'official' code in the > > trunk? > > The module concept is nothing new. The first diagram module (sequence > diagram) was introduced in release 0.28 and the plan has always been > to continue that way splitting out not just the diagrams but also > other parts of ArgoUML functionality. I know. Sorry, I meant especially your module concept for the transition. --<snip>-- > Are you targeting for UML1.4 or UML2.x (or do you not think it likely > there be any difference as far as your module is concerned). You could > always target for UML1.4 with what we have now and deal with upgrading > your module to UML2 later. At this point, we wanted to target the latest official release (read: UML 1.4). Everything else is too far away to depend on... > Do you have your own specific diagram types or are you wanting to > insert your own Figs into ArgoUML diagrams? > > If you have your own specific diagram types then are they also to > contain standard Argo Figs? At this point, we just want to create one (or maybe several) class diagram(s) from a db model. We want to add MVC elements for RAD tools. Just stereotyped classes. But the views should represent (HTML) templates, so maybe we have to work on the source tab, or so... We'll see later... Ciao, Andreas -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2382525 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
