We do have some older code with BSD licence but for some time we've been commiting against the Eclipse Public Licence - http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html
Why would we want to mix in another licence now? Bob On 4 April 2012 21:04, Andreas Rueckert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > -------- Original-Nachricht -------- > > Datum: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:23:23 -0400 > > Von: Tom Morris <[email protected]> > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: [argouml-dev] Usability Observations > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Andreas Rueckert <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Thomas agreed now to post this stuff, so... > > > > Under what license is this code for a template-based code generator > > being made available? > > I don't know. If anyone thinks, it might be useful, we'll figure > something out. I don't even know the latest Argo licensing. > I wouldn't mind LGPL or BSD, or so. I guess Thomas would also > agree to the current Argo licensing scheme. If not, speak up Thomas! > > Ciao, > Andreas > > -- > NEU: FreePhone 3-fach-Flat mit kostenlosem Smartphone! > Jetzt informieren: http://mobile.1und1.de/?ac=OM.PW.PW003K20328T7073a > > ------------------------------------------------------ > > http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2944668 > > To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [ > [email protected]]. > To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, > email: [[email protected]] > ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2944683 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]
