[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14716566#comment-14716566
 ] 

John Ross commented on ARIES-1387:
----------------------------------

Sorry for being wishy-washy about this, but I just can't get a nagging feeling 
out of my mind. I guess I'm just nervous about introducing new and perhaps 
unnecessary restrictions on the implementation. The opposing argument in my 
mind runs as follows.

(1) The specification does not impose an ordering on clauses, attributes, or 
directives.
(2) The most important thing is that an equivalent, not necessarily a string 
equals, value is returned such that the end result of processing the 
constituent parts of the string would be the same. This satisfies the 
requirement of always getting back the same results given the same parameters, 
but perhaps from a different perspective.

I'm not saying I object to the current approach. I just want to be sure the 
alternatives are considered. Is it possible that the equals/hashCode approach 
would be the better solution here considering it would seem to satisfy your 
requirements without introducing an ordering guarantee that currently does not 
exist? 

> Make Subsystem header items order reproducible
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARIES-1387
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1387
>             Project: Aries
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Subsystem
>            Reporter: Cristiano Gavião
>
> Currently the org.apache.aries.subsystem.core.archive.SubsystemContentHeader 
> class (line 210) and other headers classes uses a HashSet in order to hold 
> its clauses.
> HashSet doesn't ensure the order of its items and then its impossible to have 
> a reproducible build of any manifest file. As the SubsystemManifest class 
> doesn't provide a equals() method, we can't compare a generated manifest file 
> with any template in a test, it will fail.
> The propose it to change the used HashSet for the LinkedHashSet class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to