+1 (binding) On Tue, Sep 1, 2026, 12:12 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Tuesday, September 1, 2026, Rok Mihevc <[email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for pushing this Antoine! > > > > Rok > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 4:59 PM Jacob Quinn <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 8:30 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > This is a vote about the informal deprecation of Tensor and > > SparseTensor > > > > messages in the IPC protocol. This was previously discussed in > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2kl4g1353mbtgpt3qo7j3bzohq0q7fv > > > > > > > > Here is the proposal: > > > > > > > > 1) informally deprecate Tensor and SparseTensor-related IPC messages > in > > > > the IPC protocol description and the IPC Flatbuffers definitions > > > > > > > > (the Flatbuffers deprecation mechanism is *not* used for now because > it > > > > would break existing usage: > > > > https://flatbuffers.dev/evolution/#removal) > > > > > > > > 2) encourage Arrow implementations to deprecate (and possibly remove) > > > > APIs for reading and writing Tensor / SparseTensor metadata and data > > > > using the IPC protocol. > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 to the proposal > > > > [ ] +0 > > > > [ ] -1 to the proposal because ... > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
