+1 On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 3:01 AM Joris Van den Bossche < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Wed, 2 Sept 2026 at 11:45, Weston Pace <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026, 3:02 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Max, > > > > > > Thanks for the pointer. It might be useful in the future indeed. > > > > > > (though we may just as well rely on conventions, and let each Arrow > > > implementation decide what facilities they want to expose) > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Antoine. > > > > > > > > > Le 02/09/2026 à 03:56, Max Burke a écrit : > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Apologies if this is the wrong thread but there is a proposal open > for > > > > flatbuffers to create a "deprecated readonly" attribute that keeps > > > > generating getters for the attributed field but prevents the > generation > > > of > > > > the setters, so data that includes this field is unaffected but new > data > > > > can't use it. > > > > > > > > https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/8192 > > > > > > > > Figured I'd highlight this if anyone wishes to voice their support, > it > > > > seems like it might be a good match :-) > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 2:23 PM Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 (binding) > > > >> > > > >> El mar, 1 sept 2026, 23:02, Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> > escribió: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 (binding) > > > >>> > > > >>> In <[email protected]> > > > >>> "[VOTE] Informal deprecation of Tensor and SparseTensor in IPC" > on > > > Tue, > > > >>> 1 Sep 2026 16:30:36 +0200, > > > >>> Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hello, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> This is a vote about the informal deprecation of Tensor and > > > >>>> SparseTensor messages in the IPC protocol. This was previously > > > >>>> discussed in > > > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2kl4g1353mbtgpt3qo7j3bzohq0q7fv > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Here is the proposal: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 1) informally deprecate Tensor and SparseTensor-related IPC > messages > > > >>>> in the IPC protocol description and the IPC Flatbuffers > definitions > > > >>>> > > > >>>> (the Flatbuffers deprecation mechanism is *not* used for now > because > > > >>>> it would break existing usage: > > > >>>> https://flatbuffers.dev/evolution/#removal) > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 2) encourage Arrow implementations to deprecate (and possibly > remove) > > > >>>> APIs for reading and writing Tensor / SparseTensor metadata and > data > > > >>>> using the IPC protocol. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> [ ] +1 to the proposal > > > >>>> [ ] +0 > > > >>>> [ ] -1 to the proposal because ... > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Antoine. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
