+1 (binding)
On Sat, Sep 5, 2026, at 03:58, Benjamin Kietzman wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 3:01 AM Joris Van den Bossche < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Wed, 2 Sept 2026 at 11:45, Weston Pace <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026, 3:02 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Hi Max, >> > > >> > > Thanks for the pointer. It might be useful in the future indeed. >> > > >> > > (though we may just as well rely on conventions, and let each Arrow >> > > implementation decide what facilities they want to expose) >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > >> > > Antoine. >> > > >> > > >> > > Le 02/09/2026 à 03:56, Max Burke a écrit : >> > > > Hi! >> > > > >> > > > Apologies if this is the wrong thread but there is a proposal open >> for >> > > > flatbuffers to create a "deprecated readonly" attribute that keeps >> > > > generating getters for the attributed field but prevents the >> generation >> > > of >> > > > the setters, so data that includes this field is unaffected but new >> data >> > > > can't use it. >> > > > >> > > > https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/pull/8192 >> > > > >> > > > Figured I'd highlight this if anyone wishes to voice their support, >> it >> > > > seems like it might be a good match :-) >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2026 at 2:23 PM Raúl Cumplido <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> +1 (binding) >> > > >> >> > > >> El mar, 1 sept 2026, 23:02, Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> >> escribió: >> > > >> >> > > >>> +1 (binding) >> > > >>> >> > > >>> In <[email protected]> >> > > >>> "[VOTE] Informal deprecation of Tensor and SparseTensor in IPC" >> on >> > > Tue, >> > > >>> 1 Sep 2026 16:30:36 +0200, >> > > >>> Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Hello, >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> This is a vote about the informal deprecation of Tensor and >> > > >>>> SparseTensor messages in the IPC protocol. This was previously >> > > >>>> discussed in >> > > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/z2kl4g1353mbtgpt3qo7j3bzohq0q7fv >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Here is the proposal: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> 1) informally deprecate Tensor and SparseTensor-related IPC >> messages >> > > >>>> in the IPC protocol description and the IPC Flatbuffers >> definitions >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> (the Flatbuffers deprecation mechanism is *not* used for now >> because >> > > >>>> it would break existing usage: >> > > >>>> https://flatbuffers.dev/evolution/#removal) >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> 2) encourage Arrow implementations to deprecate (and possibly >> remove) >> > > >>>> APIs for reading and writing Tensor / SparseTensor metadata and >> data >> > > >>>> using the IPC protocol. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> [ ] +1 to the proposal >> > > >>>> [ ] +0 >> > > >>>> [ ] -1 to the proposal because ... >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Regards >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Antoine. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >>
