+1
> On Nov 1, 2024, at 10:37, Mike Carey <dtab...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 9:28 AM Ian Maxon <ima...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> I propose to amend the last Paragraph of the APE process, after
>>>
>>> All of this information should be posted to dev@asterixdb.apache.org in
>> a
>>> [DISCUSS] thread. After the discussion seems to come to a conclusion of
>>> some sort, then a [VOTE] should be issued and kept open for 72 hours. The
>>> vote is analogous to the process for releases.
>>>
>>
>> To add the following:
>> --------------------------
>> An APE can be accepted with only a [DISCUSS] thread when all of the the
>> following conditions are met:
>> -The discussion thread has been open for 72 hours, and no changes or
>> questions have been presented
>> -The APE does not deprecate or break any existing feature, user facing API
>> or language
>> -At least 3 PMC members have expressed positive sentiment (e.g. +1) toward
>> the change in the discussion thread
>>
>> If all of these criteria are met, the thread owner should send an email to
>> the end of the thread prefixed with [ACCEPT] in the title, stating that the
>> APE is accepted under the streamlined vote process.
>> --------------------------
>>
>>
>> Please vote
>> [ ] +1 adopt the amendment
>> [ ] 0 modify the amendment because ...
>> [ ] -1 do not adopt the amendment because ...
>>
>> This procedural vote follows the common format of majority rule, that is
>> if there are more favorable votes than unfavorable ones, the issue
>> is considered to have passed [2].
>>
>> PMC members have formally binding votes, but we encourage all community
>> members to vote.
>>
>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours or until 3 votes have been cast.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Ian
>>
