+1 Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 1, 2024, at 2:23 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 > >> On Nov 1, 2024, at 10:37, Mike Carey <dtab...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 9:28 AM Ian Maxon <ima...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> I propose to amend the last Paragraph of the APE process, after >>>> >>>> All of this information should be posted to dev@asterixdb.apache.org in >>> a >>>> [DISCUSS] thread. After the discussion seems to come to a conclusion of >>>> some sort, then a [VOTE] should be issued and kept open for 72 hours. The >>>> vote is analogous to the process for releases. >>>> >>> >>> To add the following: >>> -------------------------- >>> An APE can be accepted with only a [DISCUSS] thread when all of the the >>> following conditions are met: >>> -The discussion thread has been open for 72 hours, and no changes or >>> questions have been presented >>> -The APE does not deprecate or break any existing feature, user facing API >>> or language >>> -At least 3 PMC members have expressed positive sentiment (e.g. +1) toward >>> the change in the discussion thread >>> >>> If all of these criteria are met, the thread owner should send an email to >>> the end of the thread prefixed with [ACCEPT] in the title, stating that the >>> APE is accepted under the streamlined vote process. >>> -------------------------- >>> >>> >>> Please vote >>> [ ] +1 adopt the amendment >>> [ ] 0 modify the amendment because ... >>> [ ] -1 do not adopt the amendment because ... >>> >>> This procedural vote follows the common format of majority rule, that is >>> if there are more favorable votes than unfavorable ones, the issue >>> is considered to have passed [2]. >>> >>> PMC members have formally binding votes, but we encourage all community >>> members to vote. >>> >>> The vote is open for at least 72 hours or until 3 votes have been cast. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Ian >>> >
