When using gitpubsub one can either use an existing git repository or have a specific one just for the site.
Right now it seems to me that it would be better to have a specific repository as a) it avoids checking build artifacts into the source repository and b) it’s a little cleaner than putting the site into either the asterixdb or the hyracks repo. Thoughts? Other opinions? Thanks, Till > On May 3, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, thanks! > > I didn't know we could but after your mail I found humbedooh's blog post [1]. > That seems to be the better way. > > Cheers, > Till > > [1] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available > >> On May 3, 2015, at 07:41, Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Seeing as the project is using Git for source code, I'd suggest trying >> gitpubsub instead. >> >> >>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> now that the code is imported, we should be able to build and deploy a site. >>> I’ve created a request [1] to create an SVN repository, so that we can >>> deploy the site via svnpubsub. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9579 >> >> >> >> -- >> Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare, >> and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three)
