It definitely should be it's own repository, in my mind at least. -Ian
On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for a specific one.... > > > On 5/3/15 1:08 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > >> When using gitpubsub one can either use an existing git repository or >> have a specific one just for the site. >> >> Right now it seems to me that it would be better to have a specific >> repository as >> a) it avoids checking build artifacts into the source repository and >> b) it’s a little cleaner than putting the site into either the asterixdb >> or the hyracks repo. >> >> Thoughts? Other opinions? >> >> Thanks, >> Till >> >> On May 3, 2015, at 9:13 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, thanks! >>> >>> I didn't know we could but after your mail I found humbedooh's blog post >>> [1]. >>> That seems to be the better way. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>> [1] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available >>> >>> On May 3, 2015, at 07:41, Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Seeing as the project is using Git for source code, I'd suggest trying >>>> gitpubsub instead. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 3, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> now that the code is imported, we should be able to build and deploy a >>>>> site. >>>>> I’ve created a request [1] to create an SVN repository, so that we can >>>>> deploy the site via svnpubsub. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Till >>>>> >>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9579 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Any world that can produce the Taj Mahal, William Shakespeare, >>>> and Stripe toothpaste can't be all bad. (C.R. MacNamara, One Two Three) >>>> >>> >
